Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 21, 2017No. A16-1607PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RODENBERG, Judge

Appellant challenges her convictions of aiding and abetting first-degree aggravated robbery, aiding and abetting second-degree assault, aiding and abetting third-degree assault, and aiding and abetting simple robbery. She asserts that she is entitled to a new trial because the district court erred in its accomplice-liability instruction to the jury. Because the district court’s jury instruction did not misstate the law, we affirm.

FACTS

This case arises from an assault and robbery in the home of N.N. and A.M. on December 21, 2013. J.F. was there as a visitor. On that day,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. MahkukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. State v. MiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. State of Minnesota v. Dylan Micheal KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  5. State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, IISupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McKenzy Alfred v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API