State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODENBERG, Judge
Appellant challenges her convictions of aiding and abetting first-degree aggravated robbery, aiding and abetting second-degree assault, aiding and abetting third-degree assault, and aiding and abetting simple robbery. She asserts that she is entitled to a new trial because the district court erred in its accomplice-liability instruction to the jury. Because the district court’s jury instruction did not misstate the law, we affirm.
FACTS
This case arises from an assault and robbery in the home of N.N. and A.M. on December 21, 2013. J.F. was there as a visitor. On that day,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. MahkukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. MiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State of Minnesota v. Dylan Micheal KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, IISupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McKenzy Alfred v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023