Legal Opinion
Bragg v. City of Kalamazoo
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided November 6, 1978No. Docket 77-2437PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtD. F. Walsh, P.J.
Defendant appeals from the denial of its motion for summary judgment, GCR 1963, 117.2(1). The trial court rejected defendant’s claim that governmental immunity barred plaintiffs action.
On August 4, 1975, Mary Bragg, next friend of Raymond Bragg, a minor, filed a complaint against the City of Kalamazoo. Plaintiff sought damages for injuries sustained by the minor when he fell from a rope swing in a park owned by defendant.
Defendant moved for summary judgment claiming, inter alia, that it was immune from liability. MCL 691.1407; MSA 3.996(107). In denying the motion the trial judge ruled that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Thomas v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Rosario v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Gerzeski v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Maki v. City of East TawasMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. TrupianoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Fuller Central Park Properties v. City of BirminghamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Fuller Central Park Properties v. City of BirminghamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980