Legal Opinion

Lamar Bowers v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 1, 1955No. 15275PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

The suit was for the collection of penalties assessed against the defendant under Section 1359(a) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended,1 because of his failure to account for the disposition of peanuts raised by him in the years 1950-1951.

The claim was: that appellant in 1950 and 1951 engaged in the production of peanuts on his farm, and harvested in excess of his farm acreage allotments; that he failed and refused to comply with a written request from the State Committee to account for the disposition of the peanuts; and that thereupon and because…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Heiner v. DonnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. George Anderson Bowen, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  2. Norvell EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Luke v. Review CommitteeDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1957
  4. United States v. Rutherford T. Carlisle, an Individual Trading as Carlisle DrugsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  5. Lamar Bowers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API