Columbus v. Ewing

OPINION

By THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence of defendant-appellant after conviction of a violation of a traffic ordinance of the City of Columbus. The charge was that defendant did unlawfully “back to turn a Studebaker Lie. J.578 from Washington onto McCoy.”

*32Appellant in oral argument and in brief assigns three errors:

1. The trial court erred in determining that appellant’s act in backing into an intersection was a violation of Section 27.308, of the Columbus City Code.

2. Section 27.308 of the Columbus City Code, when interpreted to absolutely prohibit an automobile…