Legal Opinion

Oliver v. House

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 24, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Kimsejo Hall superior court. April 12, 1905.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

This case is now before us upon the complaint of defendants below to the overruling of their general demurrers. The substance of the petition to which they demurred, with the exception of the amendment thereto, was substantially stated when the case was here before (House v. Oliver, 123 Ga. 784), and consequently will not be set forth now. The amendment, however, was allowed after the case was originally brought here, and it alleges, in substance, the following facts: That Oliver kept the books of the firm and was familiar with them, while -plaintiff was neither familiar with the books nor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. House v. OliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Dortic v. DugasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  3. Wallace v. SissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Steadwell v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  5. Elfelt v. HartU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daniel v. Dalton News Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Daniel v. GillespieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. McMichael v. MackeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API