Legal Opinion

Echols v. Candler

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 17, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application for mandamus nisi.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

According to the principle laid down by this court in the case of Central R. Co. v. Miller, 91 Ga. 83, which was followed in the case of Conwell v. McWhorter, 93 Ga. 254, this court has no jurisdiction to grant a writ of mandamus to the end that a judge of the superior court may be compelled to approve the grounds of a motion for a new trial. While the Supreme Court may by a writ of mandamus aid a party in bringing to it a case from a trial court, it can not aid him to take any step in the lower court in a case there pending in which no writ of error has been • sued out or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Central Railroad v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marlowe v. WorrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. French v. LongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Goffe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  4. Independence Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API