Legal Opinion

Hastings v. Haug

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari to review proceedings resulting in an order for the destruction of gaming apparatus, etc. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Upon a complaint properly verified before Ithe defendant, who was one of. the police justices of the ■city of Detroit, the following warrant was issued:

“ SEARCH-WARRANT.
“ State or Michigan, ) “County of Wayne, ) ss.
“To the superintendent, or any captain, sergeant, roundsman, detective, or patrolman of Metropolitan Police Force of the city of Detroit, in said county, greeting:

f< Whereas, Thomas J. Myler, of the city of Detroit, in said county, hath this day made complaint on oath before the undersigned, one of the police justices of the city of Detroit, in said county, that goods and chattels,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brady v. North Western InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Welch v. StowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. De La MaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. NewmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API