Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. County of Riverside

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 7, 2002No. 00-56293. D.C. No. CV-99-05476-SVWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

*608As the facts are known to the parties, we do not recite them here, except as necessary to explain our holding. We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Weiner v. San Diego County, 210 F.3d 1025, 1028 (9th Cir.2000). The court’s interpretation of applicable California law is also reviewed de novo. Salve Regina College v. Russell, 499 U.S. 225, 231, 111 S.Ct. 1217, 113 L.Ed.2d 190 (1991). We review Jenkins’ claim that the court prejudiced her by setting an accelerated schedule for abuse of discretion. Hinton v. Pac. Enters., 5 F.3d 391, 395 (9th Cir.1993).

On…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Sheldon Portman v. County of Santa Clara Bob DiridonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Murray Weiner,plaintiff-Appellant v. San Diego CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Evelyn Jenkins v. County of Riverside Kenneth B. Cohen, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Jenkins v. County of RiversideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API