Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Harrell & Murphy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1923No. 14330PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodwokth, J.

1. In a'suit against a railroad company for damage to mules shipped, an allegation that “one of the said mules was wounded in the nose, which disfigured said mule and made it necessary for petitioners to treat the same and cure it, which services of petitioners and expense incurred in treating said mule, together with the decreased value of the same, amounted to $50,” is subject to a special demurrer on the ground that “it is not alleged what the expense incurred in *127treating said mule amounted to.” L. & N. Railroad Co. v. Bradford, 135 Ga. 522 (1) (69 S. E. 870); Turley v. Atlanta, Knoxville…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. BarnwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Kidwell v. Oregon Short Line R.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  4. Turley v. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. American Railway Express Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spielberg v. McEntireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Ingram v. Davis, AgentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API