Bagley v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON; Circuit Judge.
Convicted of the offense of having knowingly hindered and interfered by, force and violence with the administration of the Selective Training and Service Act' of 1940,1 and given a penitentiary sentence,, defendant appealed. Here he insists that; the indictment did not charge,2 the proof 3 *569did not make out, the offense, and the judgment must be reversed. We agree. The language in which the act was couched was not put there by accident or inadvertence. It was carefully chosen by Congress when this country was not at war but only preparing for its eventuality in order…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Viereck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kessler v. StreckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Colyer v. SkeffingtonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1920
- McGeorge v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Strecker v. KesslerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. John Wayne BaranskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Turchick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. FarinasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Charles Larry Turchick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977