Legal Opinion

Rider v. Carranza

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 23, 2020No. A171323PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

616 Submitted May 8, reversed and remanded September 23, 2020 Cathi RIDER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Raelene CARRANZA, Defendant-Appellant. Klamath County Circuit Court 19LT06171; A171323

475 P3d 467

Defendant appeals a judgment entered in a residential eviction proceeding, arguing that the trial court erred when it concluded that amendments to ORS 90.427 enacted through Senate Bill (SB) 608 (2019) were inapplicable because the notice of eviction was sent to defendant prior to passage of SB 608. SB 608, with limited exceptions, abolished no-cause evictions for month-to-month tenancies after the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Saif Corp. v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HeastonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Summit RWP, Inc. v. HallinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. Stanton v. MedellinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Myers v. Owners of Certain Real PropertyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. Summit RWP, Inc. v. HallinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API