Legal Opinion

Atha v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 3, 1949No. 4565PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrank G. Smith, J.

Two indictments for misdemeanors were returned against appellant for the illegal sale of intoxicating liquors. In one, No. 363, the illegal sale was alleged to have been made to one J. E. Hudson, and in the other indictment No. 365, the sale was alleged to have been made to one Harry Golden. He was tried upon both indictments at the same time. He was found, guilty by the jury of making a sale to Hudson and not guilty of making the alleged sale to Golden, and he has prosecuted this appeal to reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict finding him guilty. For the reversal of this judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Silvie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. Halley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  3. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. Drifoos v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Owen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API