Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Ulrikson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from circuit court, Lincoln county. Hon. J. W. Jones, Judge. Action to recover the value of a half interest in a threshing machine. Verdict was rendered in favor of defendant, but set aside and a new trial granted. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. The action was instituted to recover the value of a half interest in a threshing machine .outfit which plaintiff al*568leged he sold to the defendant for $909. The answer was a general denial. Verdict and judgment for the defendant. A motion for a new trial was made and granted, from which order granting a new trial the defendant appeals.

The motion for a new trial was made upon three statutory-grounds: (1) That the verdict and judgment are against law. (2) Insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. (3) Errors of law occurring at the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  2. Hall v. The Bark "Emily Banning"California Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Grant v. GrantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Alt v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Schillinger v. Town of VeronaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peart v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API