Legal Opinion
United States v. Lozado
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 20, 2015No. 14-1094PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHESON, Circuit Judge.
At his jury trial for being a felon in possession of ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), Gregory Lozado asked the district court to admit a hearsay statement from his brother-in-law, Novelle Far-ris, claiming ownership of the ammunition. The court excluded the statement because it did not meet the hearsay exception requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(3) for a statement against interest. The jury convicted Mr. Lozado. The court sentenced him to prison for 235 months.
Mr. Lozado now appeals. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. RodellaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. PietteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. HammersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Walker v. SpinaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- State v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.