Legal Opinion

Lindquist v. Hayes, Admx.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1926No. 1671PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

Inez Hayes, as administratrix of the estate of Paul C. Hayes, deceased, instituted an action against May Hayes Lindquist, claiming that she had concealed, embezzled and conveyed away money belonging to said decedecedent and assets belonging to his estate.

6. Fraudulent or criminal intent is not a necessary element in making out the plaintiff’s case under these sections.

7. Evidence in answer to the questions asked Lindquist would be immaterial, and none dent.

Upon trial, Lindquist was called for cross-examination, and admitted that she had withdrawn $13,120.37 from the bank believing that she…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PoppOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. State v. HarmonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. In re Estate of OhmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Jones v. WhaleyAthens County Court of Common Pleas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API