Legal Opinion

Thorne v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1925No. 6 Div. 614PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

There are numerous objections and exceptions to questions and answers appearing in the examination of prosecutrix relative to her pregnancy as a result of the act of intercourse which took place as a result of the alleged promise of marriage, and also as to the birth of a child and the date of its birth, and the paternity of such child. That a child was born as a result of the cohabitation was relevant. Cunningham v. State, 73 Ala. 51; Whatley v. State, 19 Ala. App. 282, 97 So. 121. The date of birth, if within the period of normal gestation, is admissible. Whatley v. State, 144 Ala. 68, 39…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Whatley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. State Ex Rel. Stubblefield v. WoodruffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  5. Kelly v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mullins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Adams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Weldon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Wyres v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API