Legal Opinion
Dow v. Hc2, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 30, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2021-1197Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. ROSEMARIE A. DOW, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-1197 (JDB) HC2, INC., and PAE LABAT-ANDERSON, LLC, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Rosemarie Dow wishes to pursue this action against two litigation support service companies under the False Claims Act. But False Claims Act relators must have counsel, and in the nine months since Dow’s original counsel withdrew, she has not replaced them. The Court therefore dismisses this case for failure to prosecute. The Court also resolves Dow’s request to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- In Re Application of National Broadcasting Company, Inc., American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., and Cbs, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- MetLife, Inc. v. Financial Stability Oversight CouncilCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.