Legal Opinion

Hollander v. K-Site 400 Associates

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 24, 1995No. 94-1645PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Condominium unit buyers, Milton B. Hollander and Betty R. Hollander, appeal an amended final judgment which required escrow agent, Chicago Title, to return only those deposit funds held on the date the lawsuit was served. We reverse and direct the trial court to follow the mandate of this court in Hollander v. K-Site 400 Assocs. Through Ben Franklin Properties 440, Inc., 630 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

A trial court does not have discretionary authority to alter or modify an appellate court’s mandate. See O.P. Corp. v. Village of N. Palm Beach, 302 So.2d 130 (Fla.1974); Berger v. Leposky,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Airvac, Inc. v. Ranger Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. CORPORATION v. Village of North Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  3. Berger v. LeposkySupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  4. Valsecchi v. Proprietors Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Modine Mfg. Co. v. ABC Radiator, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moreno v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Metropcs Communications, Inc. v. PorterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API