Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Nessel Town

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 14, 1992No. C5-91-2435PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Appellants, the Olsons, challenge the trial court determination that a parcel of land, never dedicated to the public when platted, is not a town road. The Olsons characterize their appeal as from the partial summary judgment entered before trial. Upon three cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court denied the Olsons’ motion in an order implicitly granting Nes-sel’s motion, holding that a street shown on a plat was not a town road and that Nessel therefore lacked the right to vacate the street. After the trial between the Olsons and respondents, the Johnsons,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wise v. BixCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API