Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Slattery

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1972No. 229PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

While the appeal here is only as to the matter of damages, all claims of error relate to discretionary rulings by the trial court. It is contended, as to each point raised, that the trial court went beyond the outer limits of the area of judicial discretion. While we find neither error nor abuse of discretion in any of the rulings challenged, we deal separately with each issue raised.

Element of surprise. Three weeks before trial, the plaintiff was examined by Dr. Lawrence Foster who determined that her injured leg was 1.5 cm. (% inch) longer than her uninjured leg and a future bone-stapling…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Springen v. Ager Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Chille v. HowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Zweifel v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Fredrickson v. Louisville Ladder Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Neider v. SpoehrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Vallejo v. Jamestown CollegeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. LehmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hochgurtel v. San FelippoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Featherly v. Continental Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API