Legal Opinion

Simon v. Dibble

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1964No. 14273PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Chief Justice.

This suit presents the question of whether or not an insane husband who shoots and kills his wife, may receive the proceeds of insurance policies taken out by her with him as beneficiary, and whether or not he may inherit her share of the community property. On November 12, 1962, Orlando V. Dibble, Jr., while insane, shot and •killed his wife, Sabina Julia Dibble. She left two insurance policies in which he was •the beneficiary, and the insurance companies have paid into court the proceeds of these policies with the request that the court determine who should receive…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. McDavidDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1941
  2. In re the Accounting of StanleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
  3. Anderson v. GrasbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Holdom v. Ancient Order of United WorkmenIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Eisenhardt v. SiegelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ford v. FordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Laborers' Pension Fund v. MiscevicCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. Congleton v. SansomDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. John R. Armstrong v. Terry L. ArmstrongMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Giles v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API