Legal Opinion

Brookenick Development Co. v. Bruce

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided August 20, 2009No. C.A. No. PC-2008-2285Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

Before this Court is Brookenick Development Company's ("Brookenick's") Amended Motion for Injunctive Relief. In response, the Town of Cumberland ("Town"), by and through Thomas Bruce III, the Town's Finance Director and Treasurer, and Eugene Jeffers, the Town's Director of Public Works, contends that granting this equitable remedy will deprive the Town of its right to have a jury decide all of the factual issues of Brookenick's claims. Brookenick disputes the Town's right to a jury trial. Jurisdiction is pursuant to Super. R. Civ. P. 38.

Facts and Travel

On March 21, 2008, Brookenick…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API