Fitzgerald v. Neustadt
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This is an action of claim and delivery brought by respondent as assignee in the matter of Joseph Goodman, in insolvency, against appellant, to recover a stock of merchandise of the value of three thousand dollars. Appellant claims title to the goods by virtue of purchase from Goodman, made within thirty daji-s next preceding his adjudication in insolvency. -This is an appeal from the judgment, and order denying her motion for a new trial.
1. The following allegation of the complaint, which was not denied, is sufficient to establish the insolvent’s financial condition at the time of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Herndon v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Dambmann v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Luhrs v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Rogers v. StevensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
- Cone v. . PurcellNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sweet v. HamilothorisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bergerow v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Maltby v. ConklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Karlik v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Dávila Díaz v. Balet PuigSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.