Legal Opinion

Vogel v. Hohenstein

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1975No. 12006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice:

The appellants Vogel brought an action seeking to compel the appellees Hohenstein to specifically perform on the Vogels’ alleged exercise of a written option to purchase realty. The trial judge ordered the dismissal of the complaint. This court has jurisdiction of the resulting appeal pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court.

The material portions of the option provided as follows:

“$50,000.00, total selling price. $10,000.-00 down as of November 1, 1968. Balance in 10 years at 7 percent interest. If trust company is to be used as escrow agent it will be buyer expense.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Polk v. KoernerArizona Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arizona Board of Regents v. Arizona York Refrigeration Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Cavanagh v. SchaeferArizona Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API