Legal Opinion
Seaman v. Haskins
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1801PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Thebe was a demurrer to the plea, in this cause, which the court, at the last term, decided was not well taken.
1Per curiam
After the court have given judgment, and ordered it to be entered, and a term has elapsed, the party comes too late to ask for leave to withdraw his demurrer. He should have applied at the last term, before the rule for judgment was entered.
Motion denied.(a)(a) See Andrews v. Beecher, supra, vol. 1, p. 411. Hildreth v. Harvey, infra, vol. 3, p. 301. Furman v. Haskins, 2 Caines, 369. Currie v. Henry, 3 Johns. R. 140. Miller v. Heath, 7 Cowen, 101. Boltons v. Lawrence, 7 Wend. 461. Patrick v. Conrad, 3 A. K. Marsh, 612. Surlott v. Pratt, id. 174. Ralston v. Bullits, 3 Bibb, 261. Violett v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Furman v. HaskinNew York Supreme Court · 1805
- Johnson's executors v. DeasonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1814
- Boltons v. LawrenceNew York Supreme Court · 1831
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fisher v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Fisher v. GouldNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1879