Legal Opinion
Chapin v. Chapin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 5, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err in directing that the marital residence be sold immediately and that 60% of the net proceeds be paid to plaintiff and 40% be paid to defendant. In deciding whether to award exclusive use and possession of the marital residence to the custodial parent during the child’s minority or to direct its immediate sale, the court properly weighed the need for the custodial parent to remain in it against the financial situation of the parties (see, Stolow…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- DeCabrera v. Cabrera-RoseteNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Hackett v. HackettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Blackman v. BlackmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Ginsberg v. GinsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Stolow v. StolowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Victor L. v. Darlene L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Hiross v. HirossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Hecht v. HechtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Tassone v. TassoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994