Legal Opinion

Ray v. Farris

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 23, 1994No. 06-93-00105-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Justice.

This is an appeal of the judgment of the trial court finding the defendant not negligent and denying the plaintiffs motion for new trial. The appellant brings six points of error: (1) the trial court erred in transferring venue to Lamar County; (2) the trial court erred in entering judgment on the jury’s finding that defendant was not negligent, as negligence was proved as a matter of law; (3) the trial court erred in denying plaintiffs motion for new trial, as the jury’s finding was against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence; (4) the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. Conoco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wilson v. Texas Parks & Wildlife DepartmentTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Tenneco, Inc. v. Salyer, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
  4. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Commercial State Bank v. AlgeoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Velasco v. Texas Kentworth Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  2. Ray v. FarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Honeywell International Inc. v. Deborah H. Davis, Individually and as Independent of the Estate of Hubert W. Davis, Jr. and Bernadine Neighbor, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API