Legal Opinion
Broussard v. Zim's Alignment Service, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 14, 1986No. 85-541PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
W. ELLIS BOND, Judge Pro Tem.
Plaintiff-Appellant received an injury to his left eye while in the course and scope of his employment by Zim’s Alignment Service in October 1978. The injury resulted in partial loss of vision in that eye. He returned to work thereafter and continued to perform the duties of his job, with some limitations, until he was discharged in April 1982 when his employer learned he was about to leave to open a competitive business. Thereafter, plaintiff opened Bruce’s Alignment Service and continued to operate it at the time of trial in August 1984.
The trial court ruled…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Jacks v. Banister Pipelines AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- LaFleur v. Hartford Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Stolier v. StolierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Jacks v. Banister Pipelines AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gibson v. Lake Charles Ice PiratesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Elliott v. El Paso CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Fireplace Equipment v. PetruskaColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Elliott v. El Paso CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1993