Legal Opinion

Arnett v. Office of Administrative Hearings

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1996No. C020868PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPARKS, J.

In this appeal we must determine whether a licensed physician who is incarcerated in another state for felony offenses has an absolute right to be present at an administrative hearing against his California license, such that the administrative hearing must be continued indefinitely. We agree with the trial court that the physician does not have an absolute right to be present and shall affirm the judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandate. However, we agree with the physician that the judgment in this case is too broad and hence shall modify the judgment.

Factual and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bussard v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. (PC) Robinson v. ScottDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  3. Multiversal Enterprises-Mammoth Properties, LLC v. Yelp Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  4. Multiversal Enterprises-Mammoth Properties, LLC v. Yelp, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. The People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API