Legal Opinion

Peabody v. JONES & LAMSON MACHINE COMPANY

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 7, 1961No. 1208PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.

The claimant, Ethel Peabody, was found by the Commissioner of Industrial Relations to be a partial dependent of her son during his lifetime, within the terms of 21 V.S.A. §634. The son died under circumstances yielding workmen’s compensation coverage for qualified dependents. Upon his death the claimant, as beneficiary, became entitled to the proceeds of life insurance policies in the amount of $9,560.00 and government bonds in the amount of $75.00. As sole legatee of her son’s estate the claimant became entitled to an additional sum amounting to a little over $200.00.

The commissioner found…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Hathorn's Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  2. McKane v. Capital Hill Quarry Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  3. Petition of Lyndonville VillageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. King v. SnideSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  2. Moody v. Humphrey & Harding, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1968
  3. Houle v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  4. Gagliardi v. Downing & Perkins, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  5. Federico v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API