Botts v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, District Judge
The same question of jurisdiction is presented by this writ of error that has been decided in the case of Rosencranz v. United States, 155 Fed. 38, and for the reasons announced in the opinion filed therein we affirm the action of the lower court overruling the pleas in abatement and the demurrers, and pass to the consideration of other points.
The record shows that the prosecution was conducted upon the theory that if the government proved that the reputation of the house situated upon the lot described in the indictment was that it was a bawdyhouse, and that if defendants as owners knew of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Toney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Rosencranz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
- Drake v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
- State v. HendricksMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. BoardmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. FarrierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- State ex rel. Shotwell v. LeflangNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- The People v. AlterieIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Fields v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.