Dunker v. Brown County Board of Education
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Dissent
HANSON, P. J„
(dissenting). I am unable to concur.
The scope of judicial review over administrative action is not involved. No party raised the question in the trial court or in this court. It is a constitutional, rather than a jurisdictional, question which has been injected into the case by the majority of this court and by them determined without benefit of a hearing, briefs or oral argument. As such it may be considered dictum. Munns v. Stenman, 152 Cal.App.2d 543, 314 P.2d 67. Furthermore, the extent of this far reaching dictum is not indicated for the edification and future guidance of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Munns v. StenmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Application of Dakota Transp. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- Camp Crook Independent School District No. 1 v. ShevlingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Williams v. Stanley County Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Olson v. Pulaski Common School DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.