Legal Opinion

Ferrari v. Paramount Plumbing & Heating Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 21, 1964PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, entered on November 27, 1963, granting the plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint by increasing the ad damnum clause from $100,000 to $500,000 and to amend the bill of particulars, reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellants, and the motion denied, without prejudice, however, to a renewal of the motion, if plaintiff be so advised, upon condition that plaintiff pay the costs of the action to date and upon any other conditions, if any, Special Term may see fit to impose upon such renewal. To permit the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brennan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Huston v. RaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Colonel v. Targee Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Luongo v. Hollander AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Piccinich v. Grace Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API