Legal Opinion

Zepeda v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 2012No. 38199PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Jose Luis Zepeda, Jr., appeals from the summary dismissal of his petition for post- conviction relief. He asserts that the dismissal was erroneous because he presented a meritorious claim that his trial attorney’s refusal to file a motion to withdraw Zepeda’s guilty plea upon his request was ineffective assistance of counsel.

I

BACKGROUND

In June 2009, an acquaintance gave Zepe-da a ride to Rupert, Idaho. The acquaintance then asked permission to park his car at Zepeda’s house overnight and pick it up the following day. Zepeda agreed, and the acquaintance left a key to the car…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Jamie Lee NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. Jeremy York CunninghamIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Bishop v. Boral Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
  4. State v. Jamie Lee Nelson (Rinehart)Idaho Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API