Zepeda v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
Jose Luis Zepeda, Jr., appeals from the summary dismissal of his petition for post- conviction relief. He asserts that the dismissal was erroneous because he presented a meritorious claim that his trial attorney’s refusal to file a motion to withdraw Zepeda’s guilty plea upon his request was ineffective assistance of counsel.
I
BACKGROUND
In June 2009, an acquaintance gave Zepe-da a ride to Rupert, Idaho. The acquaintance then asked permission to park his car at Zepeda’s house overnight and pick it up the following day. Zepeda agreed, and the acquaintance left a key to the car…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Jamie Lee NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Jeremy York CunninghamIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- Bishop v. Boral Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
- State v. Jamie Lee Nelson (Rinehart)Idaho Court of Appeals · 2016