King v. Ebrens
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
In January 2002, Anna King and Wil-lam and Crystal Stuckey ("the Homeowners") filed their complaint for injune-tive relief seeking an order from the trial court that Eric and Jennifer Ebrens remove a pole barn that the Ebrens had built on their property. The complaint alleged that the pole barn violated a restrictive covenant. The Homeowners and the Ebrens filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and the trial court granted the Ebrens' motion and denied the Homeowners' motion. The Homeowners now appeal and present the following dis-positive issue for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- George A. Darnell v. Target StoresCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Gaboury v. Ireland Road Grace Brethren, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Young v. ButtsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Wischmeyer v. FinchIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Campbell v. SpadeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cox v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Walton v. Claybridge Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Johnson v. DawsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Mayer v. BMR PROPERTIES, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. AultIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.