Bowling v. Duvall

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Stites

Affirming.

The appellee, W. T. Duvall, instituted this action to recover the sum of $610.50 from the appellants, T. C. Caswell and Wiley Bowling. Appellee claimed to have advanced this sum as agent for the appellants and at their special instance and request. Appellants pleaded that appellee, together with one Clarence Caswell and themselves, formed a partnership for the purchase of hay, and that the money here sought to be recovered was advanced by appellee on behalf of the partnership, and not on behalf of appellants individually. They further pleaded that…