Legal Opinion

Cram v. Howell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1997No. 67S01-9609-CV-608PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Petition To Transfer

DICKSON, Justice.

Finding that a physician owed no duty of care to an unknown person allegedly injured by the physician’s treatment of a patient, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of a medical malpractice complaint under Indiana Trial Rule 12(B)(6). Cram v. Howell, 662 N.E.2d 678 (Ind.Ct.App.1996). We granted transfer and now reverse the dismissal.

In reviewing a dismissal under Trial Rule 12(B)(6), an appellate court must determine whether, in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and with every inference drawn in his favor, the complaint…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Webb v. JarvisIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Cowe Ex Rel. Cowe v. Forum Group, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Gariup Const. Co., Inc. v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Stump v. Commercial UnionIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Obremski v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. April Goodwin, Tiffany Randolph and Javon Washington v. Yeakle's Sports Bar and Grill, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Davis v. South Nassau Communities HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Ratliff v. CohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State, Indiana Civil Rights Com'n v. INIIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson v. OwensbyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API