Legal Opinion

Congdon v. Congdon

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 15, 1887PublishedCited by 2 opinions

PETITION under section 1426, R. L. Heard on demurrer to the petition, September Term, 1886, Ross, J., presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Veazey, J.

The decision of the County Court was evidently based on the theory that the statute does not cover the case as made by the petition, as it was a decision as matter of law and not of discretion. The court could not exercise its discretion unless the facts alleged brought the case within the provisions of the law authorizing the proceeding. This remedy is limited to cases where ‘ ‘ the petitioner has been prevented from taking or entering an appeal by fraud, accident or mistake ” R. L. sec. 1426.

(1.) The fraud alleged pertained to the allowance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Babcock v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
  2. Burbeck v. LittleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1878
  3. Sleeper v. CrokerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1874

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Walker's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  2. Wellington v. WellingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API