Worster Motor Lines, Inc. v. Ross
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Pee Curiam,
The findings of the chancellor are supported by substantial evidence. Having been confirmed by the court en banc, on exceptions thereto, they have the binding effect of a jury’s verdict and will not be disturbed on *491appeal: Maxwell v. Schaefer, 381 Pa. 13, 19, 112 A. 2d 69. From the findings, so established, the chancellor correctly drew the legal conclusions which, in turn, have resulted in the final decree entered by the court en banc.
The decree is affirmed at the appellant’s costs.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Maxwell v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
3Cited by1 opinion
- Capozzi v. CumminsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960