Legal Opinion

In re Harvey S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 27, 2007PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding for permission to administer electroconvulsive therapy to a patient without his consent, the patient appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), dated April 24, 2006, which, after a hearing, granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In a companion appeal, we have determined that the Supreme Court properly authorized Rockland Psychiatric Center (hereinafter RPC) to retain the patient on an involuntary basis, pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.33 (see Matter of Harvey S., 38 AD3d 908 [2007] [decided…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rivers v. KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. In re William S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. In re Joseph O.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re Mary Ann D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. In re Pilgrim Psychiatric CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Radcliffe M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Matter of Beverly F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. In re Adam K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. In re Adam K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. In re DolanNew York Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API