Legal Opinion
Douglas v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 25, 1948No. 46 C 1535PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action under the Anti-Trust laws of the United States (15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 to 27 inclusive), seeking to recover treble damages for the alleged conspiracy existing between the three defendants to monopolize trade in the field of vitamins and vitamin products. The defendants filed separate answers to the complaint, denying such a conspiracy. Subsequently, defendant Wisconsin Research moved to amend its answer so as to allege that an action had been previously brought by it against this plaintiff for patent infringement; that th'e answer filed in that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States of America, Libelant-Appellant v. Eastport Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Irwin H. Lawhorn v. The Atlantic Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Critical-Vac Filtration Corporation v. Minuteman International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Switzer Bros., Inc. v. LocklinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Hartley Pen Co. v. Lindy Pen Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.