Holt v. County of Tioga
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Chief Judge Cooke
(dissenting). A reading of the pertinent constitutional and statutory provisions and case law reveals nothing that authorizes the County of Tioga’s enactment of Local Law No. 2 of 1978. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.
The majority finds two constitutional bases for validating the local law. First, the majority relies on a local government’s authority to legislate as to “[t]he presentation, ascertainment and discharge of claims against it” (NY Const, art IX, § 2, subd [c], par [ii], cl [5]). Reading this in conjunction with subdivision 4 of section 50-e of the General…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bernardine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- MacMullen v. . City of MiddletownNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Davis v. . Supreme Lodge, Knights of HonorNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Fullerton v. City of SchenectadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Fullerton v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.