Sees v. Bank One, Indiana, N.A.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
839 N.E.2d 154 (2005)
John Thomas SEES, Appellant (Petitioner below),
v.
BANK ONE, INDIANA, N.A., Appellee (Respondent below).
No. 35S02-0406-CV-277.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
December 20, 2005.
John Thomas Sees, Attorney at Law, Huntington, pro se.
Martin E. Seifert, Lori W. Jansen, Haller & Colvin, P.C., Fort Wayne, for Appellee.
RUCKER, Justice.
The question presented is whether a statute that prohibits a debtor from "bring[ing] an action upon a credit agreement" unless it is in writing applies also to a debtor's assertion of an affirmative defense. We conclude it does not.
Facts and Procedural…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Shepard; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Shepard; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Boehm; Concurrence.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Scott v. Bodor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Amoco Production Co. v. LairdIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Catt v. Board of Com'rs of Knox CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Rheem Manufacturing Co. v. Phelps Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Sees v. Bank One, Indiana, N.A.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.