Legal Opinion
United States v. Riddick Lamont Bowe, Sr.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 13, 2001No. 00-4269PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Senior Judge ALARCON wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge GREGORY joined.
OPINION
ALARCON, Senior Circuit Judge:
The Government seeks reversal of the district court’s sentencing decision on discrete grounds. It maintains that the district court erred in denying the Government’s motion to set aside the plea agreement. The Government also contends that the district court clearly erred in finding that Riddick Lamont Bowe Sr.’s (“Bowe”) conduct during the commission of the crime did not involve violence or a serious threat of violence. We…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Barney Canada, A/K/A Byron Levon CanadaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Thomas Tyson ConnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Deinner RosaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Sergio Rafael GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. George R. BlickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. ZukCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. HerderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Lauro Puentes-HurtadoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.