Legal Opinion

Union Bank, and Anna Goldenberg v. United States. Jerome Goldenberg and Helena Goldenberg v. United States. Ida Goldenberg v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 18, 1961No. 52-59, 53-59, 54-59PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiffs, in their tax year 1954, received certain profits. They were required to pay income taxes upon these profits on the basis that they were ordinary income. They contend that the profits were capital gains, and taxable only as such.

Ida Goldenberg, a widow, and her son Sol developed a prosperous business in Los Angeles, California. They manufactured and sold tread rubber for the ■ retreading of tires, and materials for the repair of tires. They also distributed new tires, under a franchise from the B. F. Goodrich Company. Their market area was southern and central…

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Estate of Charles T. Franklin, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. Narver v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  4. Odend'hal v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  5. Brown v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API