Legal Opinion
Ex parte Barry
California Supreme Court
Decided September 11, 1890No. 20607PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The following affidavit was filed in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, charging the petitioner with contempt of court:—
“ State of California, ) ' SS “City and County of San Francisco. )
“William J. Dixon, being duly sworn, deposes and says that one Henry Bingham is the defendant in an action wherein the people of the state of California, upon the relation of Charles J. Swift, is plaintiff; that said action is now pending in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, state of California, and is still…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Dailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Ex Parte JoutsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- KUTV, INC. v. ConderUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Field v. ThornellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Ex Parte GreenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.