Legal Opinion

State v. Conti

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 15, 1972No. 1269-Ex. &cPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaolino, J.

This case is before us on the state’s exception to a ruling by a justice of the Superior Court granting a motion to suppress.

The sole issue raised by the state is whether the Superior Court is bound by a ruling of the District Court granting a motion to suppress.

We refer briefly to the pertinent facts. The defendant was charged with unlawful possession of cannabis (marijuana) on March 19, 1970. The defendant moved to suppress the evidence and, after a hearing on such motion, a judge of the District Court, Third Division, granted the motion. The prosecutor thereupon moved to dismiss the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AmaralSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  2. Harding v. CarrSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1951
  3. Brady v. LangloisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  4. Burke v. LangloisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. StevensSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. State v. KeeganSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API