Dunlap v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWoodley, Judge
The offense is forgery; the punishment, enhanced under Art. 63 P.C., life.
The indictment alleged that Elmer J. Dunlap, with intent to injure and defraud, made a false instrument in writing purporting to be the act of another. The instrument set out according to its tenor reads:
“THE AUSTIN NATIONAL BANK NO_
AUSTIN, TEXAS Dec. 15 1958
PAY TO THE ORDER OF North Lamar Humble $2015
Twenty and 88/100 DOLLARS
Elmer Brooks 413 Hackberry Lane
To sustain these allegations it was necessary that the state prove beyond a reasonable doubt, not only that the check was made with intent to injure and defraud, but…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carnahan, Alias v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Ware v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
3Cited by12 opinions
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Carruth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- State v. AitkenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Dunlap v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Scott Lee Orson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.