Legal Opinion

Place v. Oldham's Adm'r

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided July 9, 1850PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the Louisville Chancery Court. Administrators. Substitution. Pro rata distribution.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Marshall

R. P. Oldham, in his lifetime, executed his note to Kleissendorff & Fuist for $500, which was assigned by them to T. M. Tunstall. A judgment was obtained in 1837 by Tunstall against Oldham for the amount of the ■note, with interest and costs, and execution thereon was returned “no property found,” except as to the sum of $52 49 made upon it. Afterwards, in 1840, Kleissendorff having previously died, Tunstall in a suit upon the assignment recovered a judgment against the administratrix and heirs of Kleissendorff for $493 51, bearing interest from the date of the judgment, which was satisfied…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hutchcraft's Administrator v. TilfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Dodd's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of OosterhoudtNew York Surrogate's Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API