Legal Opinion
Siegel & Hodges v. Hodges
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 16, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.
Motion hy the infant defendant to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The complaint alleges, in substance, that A1 Siegel, a recognized professional voice teacher and musical manager of theatrical talent for more than 25 years, and defendant John W. Hodges, father of the infant defendant, entered into a partnership agreement on November 1, 1957 for the purpose of “ promoting the interests and managing the professional theatrical career ” of the infant defendant (par. “ fourth ”), “ a precocious talented child possessing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Woods v. LancetNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- International Text Book Co. v. . ConnellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Drobner v. . PetersNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Garvin v. GarvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Siegel v. HodgesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Weingast v. WeingastNew York City Family Court · 1964
- Errico v. Manville, New York County Courts1969
- Mount Sinai Hospital v. BurnsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1986
- New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. SpellCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.